progression
Change your site tag/status

Note Board

aerosteeze wrote
July 28, 2008 at 10:38
sick redbull round up pics.. could you tell me who got 1st, 2nd, and 3rd

jmgu3 wrote
July 20, 2008 at 6:59
ya im savin up for one lol

crazyass125 wrote
July 19, 2008 at 12:01
hey yeah i dont need a hydro, the mechanical jus works fine for me, thanks anyway

spinningrotors wrote
July 17, 2008 at 13:57
wow..... thats a hilarious picture of that transition frame.. wt did matt juhas say when u brought it back to him

mchong1228 wrote
June 3, 2008 at 16:55
sick pics.. do you have any of me holding it in 2 peices?

double123 wrote
May 28, 2008 at 7:11
post a picture of yor riot

karlheldt wrote
May 17, 2008 at 2:04
thanksss

fattony wrote
May 5, 2008 at 1:48
getting a lot of POD's these days! Word Crip

mkirk05 wrote
May 4, 2008 at 17:52
yea his doubles in cranbrook right now waiting to be built, and caseys bikes should be here this week i think he said

mkirk05 wrote
May 4, 2008 at 9:04
yea i do ha, im trying to convince dustin to go on a... oh shit, a fully! haha, hes never been on one, cant beleive it, but soon

mkirk05 wrote
May 3, 2008 at 23:06
wicked shots of jorides man, props

dishboy14 wrote
November 28, 2007 at 21:54
I use manual mode, then I expose on the brightist part of the image then underexspose by one stop. Also set your camera to spot metering mode.(or center weight metering mode if you dont have spot)

ito- wrote
October 31, 2007 at 9:00
The Sigma 70-200 2.8 is sweet, but if you are willing to shoot a higher ISO the Nikon 70-300 4/5.6G is a sweet lens for not much money at all. Worth it to fill in a spot until you get the money for a pro set up.

dishboy14 wrote
October 27, 2007 at 14:11
I paid just under $1000 for my 70-200mm F2.8 Sigma. These lenses are professional and dont come with a cheap price tag; however, the ability to run super fast shutter speeds in low light is well worth the money spent.